Essay about A Fat Tax: Economic Costs of Obesity are High,Essay about Obesity in America
WebOct 8, · Although obesity results from several other factors such as the lack of exercise and even genetic aspects, this paper argues that the introduction of fat taxes not only WebA fat tax is based on the assumption that when the price of goods goes up, consumption of that good lowers. The idea of a ‘fat tax’ has been supported by several public health WebAug 10, · A fat tax would also encourage producers to supply foods lower in fat and sugar. It's a simple idea, if things are expensive enough, the cost becomes prohibitive WebObesity is an epidemic that is sweeping the United States at a rapid speed, and it kills. Obesity is responsible for killing more people than anything else, except for smoking. It WebFat Tax It is well known that obesity has a negative impact on human health. However, few think about the fact that population obesity also causes sizable expenses for the global ... read more
Junk- Food taxes will encourage healthy eating in schools, consumers will buy more healthy foods, and it funds physical activity programs, and lowers health care costs. Who has not eaten junk food at least once? I did it, and to me, as to many Americans, the junk food is the most delicious type of food. However, I know it is the unhealthiest food and the main cause of obesity in the United States. On the other hand, the U. In order to combat the obesity and other health problems that junk food causes, the U. government has been looking for many ways to prevent and decrease the number of obese people in the country.
Also, the government will save money because less people will get sick. I agree that the government should definitely tax junk food for many reasons. Sacks, G. and Swinburn, B. International Journal of Obesity, 35 7 July, pp. There are many ideas to how to help the obesity problem, one being a tax on junk food; however, should the men and women buying the junk food be taxed or the producers of the junk food? Written in bold the slogan immediately catches the eye and as it cleverly rhymes is very memorable. There has been a growing concern towards the issue of obesity and efforts were made by governmental and non-governmental organizations to tackle this health problem.
A recent tax proposal on sugary beverages has caused uproar among the beverage industry because this tax, unlike the previous labeling regulations, is targeted directly towards the beverage industry. Presently, U. It would be a serious mistake to impose a tax on sugar-sweetened beverage because sugar-sweetened beverage is not the main cause of obesity, the tax wrongly attributes a large portion of responsibility of obesity to the consumers, and the tax cannot ensure a decline in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
While convenient and cheap, the widespread eating of fast food has caused many health problems throughout America. By raising taxes and making fast food more expensive, I think Americans will begin to eat healthier, other restaurants will see economic success, and the government will spend much less on health care. He talks about the behind the scenes of the way junk food is manufactured, the science behind addictions to certain foods, and the rising numbers of obesity in both children and adults. It is important for Americans to have knowledge about the actions that companies are willing to take to protect their consumers.
Obesity is growing at a faster rate than it has before. About two-thirds of the adults in America are considered obese, and statistics show that one in twenty people have extreme obesity. How many more people must be a victim to obesity before we take action? Pearlberg argues to place junk-food taxes, and regulate food commercials to fight obesity. According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, approximately one-third of Americans are obese. There are several culprits to this alarming increase such as lack of exercise, failure to research nutrition information, and modality of convenience. Schlosser correlates the increase of consumption to increase of Americans becoming obese.
As mentioned earlier, fast food availability is only one aspect of the poor health epidemic. There are not enough valid grounds to prove the increase of obesity and diseases such as diabetes. The employees of the tobacco industry are not slipping cigarettes into the pockets of civilians forcibly. Similarly, these fast food corporations despite their sophisticated marketing are not completely directing individuals to consume their foods. Individuals have the freedom of choice and should be aware that their choices may lead to…. One of the biggest issues Americans are faced with today are the increasing obesity rates that spread throughout the nation.
The American industry makes it easy to eat unhealthy. Fast food is a quick, cheap, and tasteful meal made accessible to virtually anyone. When comparing prices at a grocery store, for the most part its clear junk foods are less expensive than healthy foods. If a tax was placed on unhealthy foods, it would make a substantial difference in the way consumers shopped. More and more young people are experiencing hypertension and childhood obesity, and because of which are seemingly becoming more prone to various diseases Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks? Many take a stand on the issue, as New York for example no longer allows the use of trans fats in their restaurants. Still the cost of unhealthy food has remained nearly the same, while the cost of a high yield diet has soared beyond that of the rate of inflation Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?
Others object, saying that the tax is a form of discrimination, separating us about our assumed character and wellbeing Does This Tax Make Me Look Fat? Though the answer seems so clear to some at first how to go about imposing such taxes, it is important that the complexity of the situation is recognized to see if the tax would be effective enough to be worthwhile. The government needs to make regulations for the health safety of obese Americans by limiting super-sized sugary drinks in eateries. Fast food industries biggest customers are children, they advertise unhealthy food by cartoons commercials on T. and they put toys inside their kid meals to get kids to pester their parents to buy it for them along with the buy of an unhealthy meal.
default Some people will so become aware that the default choice is not as desirable, instead one might buy foods with trans fats, that are more desirable. Trans fat in foods are extremely important in a business to create a specific taste and texture in many foods that consumers find desirable, and without a desirable texture and taste to appeal to customers, businesses will lose customers and money. Government regulations are going to save more lives than they kill by increasing the health of today's…. For years health experts have been warning Americans to lose weight and adopt a healthier lifestyle. Over time obesity rates have tripled. It is obvious we are losing the battle against obesity.
Combating obesity and its numerous illnesses will not require more drugs to lower cholesterol, diet books, or workout videos. It will require rethinking our environment. Other measures need to be taken to tackle this national epidemic. Addressing this issue is no easy task. Several experts have suggested implementing a junk food tax. This would provide funding to regulate junk food, its advertising, and many other areas improving our health. This idea has sparked a wide controversy in regard to the obesity issue, the benefits of such a tax plan, and our cherished individual freedom that health is our own responsibility.
From to the average weight of Americans increased by 8. Higher taxes are imposed on healthy foods but not junk foods, making unhealthy foods easier and more convenient to obtain. To encourage healthy eating, higher taxes should be imposed on soft drinks and junk food. This strategy will surely influence a better diet and put America back at number one. HOME ESSAYS Fat Tax. One of the advantages that fat taxes have is that they force lovers of junk foods and sugary drinks to cater for the social expenses of their poor feeding habits. It is crucial to point out that countries invest a substantial amount of money in obesity treatment.
The UK also has alarming records of the cost it incurs treating obesity-related cases. Hence, it is crucial to realize the pivotal role that fat taxes seek to play when it comes to cutting the above costs. Besides, having few obese people implies a reduced number of deaths that result from obesity-related cases such as diabetes or hypertension. Hence, with individuals incurring extra costs to finance their obesity treatment, it is possible that fat taxes will end up reducing the number of people who can purchase such foods due to the heavy taxes attached to them. In other words, this strategy presumes that eliminating the level of purchasing such unhealthy items or the frequency of visiting eateries that sell fast foods will equally imply a decline in the number of people acquiring obesity.
Fat taxes also seek to address the amount of time that is wasted in organizations in the process of attempting to solve obesity-related matters. Obese employees are at the risk of experiencing stroke CDC, , which means that the respective organizations have to spend extra time and money availing first aid to the affected workers. Time in business matters a lot when it comes to influencing the productivity of a company. In other words, wasting time addressing problems that relate to obesity may equally lead to lower returns for the particular organization. According to Lankford , some of the problems may never be fully addressed, a situation that leaves company bosses with no other option other than firing obese individuals who cease to be fruitful in their companies.
The implication here is that more time and finances will be spent in hiring new staff members. Such resources would have been spared to address other productive issues in an organization Lankford, Hence, with fat taxes in place, these happenings would be minimal or nowhere to be recorded since few people would be associated with them. Another con that is associated with fat taxes is that they persuade people to purchase healthy foods. According to Franck, Grandi, and Eisenberg , the implication is that those who are already obese will record an improved health while those who would have joined the class of overweight individuals would save the finances that may have gone to addressing related ailments such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and stroke among others.
Besides, with fat taxes in place, manufacturers of various products would focus on low-calorie foods that would consequently reduce cases of obesity Franck et al. Similarly, fast-food eateries would have room to offer a wide range of other healthy foods to their clients, thereby contributing positively to the fight against obesity and the associated ailments. In addition, according to MacEwan et al. Low-income families invest most of their hard-earned finances in purchasing food items. Owing to their poor financial backgrounds, any slight increment in the amount that is charged on food has a heavy impact on their income. In other words, to these families, such taxes are viewed as regressive. As a result, Chudá and Janský assert that the introduction of fat taxes on foods ignores the situation of low-income people who have to spend extra dollars to avail food on the table.
However, while this claim may be true, it is crucial to realize that the overall impact on these families is almost insignificant, owing to the possibility of such fat levies being equity neutral. In this case, an increment on the price of some foods may be accompanied by a corresponding reduction in the cost of equally important other items, which such low-income families rely on daily, meaning that they will end up spending the same amount of money on an average day. Conclusively, cases of obesity have been on the rise in virtually all countries around the globe. Therefore, it is crucial for governments to put in place measures that can reduce or eliminate the menace posed by obesity.
While several other factors are associated with obesity as discussed, this paper holds that the introduction of fat taxes may be a sure way of addressing the issue of unhealthy feeding habits, hence reducing cases of obesity. Adult obesity facts. Chudá, T. The impact of a fat tax: Progressive in health, but regressive in income? Prague Economic Papers , 25 4 , Franck, C. Taxing junk food to counter obesity. American Journal of Public Health, 11 ,
Obesity can affect any person from young children to older adults. When I was younger, my grandpa had a heart attack because he had high blood pressure and he did not eat good food. In fact, today two- thirds of adults and nearly one- third of children struggle with obesity. There are many causes of obesity, including overeating, lack of physical activity, and genetics. There are also many health issues caused by obesity. The effects are depression, eating disorders, and death. For these reasons, the government needs to address this serious health concern. One solution to do so is raise Junk- Food taxes. Junk- Food taxes will encourage healthy eating in schools, consumers will buy more healthy foods, and it funds physical activity programs, and lowers health care costs.
Who has not eaten junk food at least once? I did it, and to me, as to many Americans, the junk food is the most delicious type of food. However, I know it is the unhealthiest food and the main cause of obesity in the United States. On the other hand, the U. In order to combat the obesity and other health problems that junk food causes, the U. government has been looking for many ways to prevent and decrease the number of obese people in the country. Also, the government will save money because less people will get sick. I agree that the government should definitely tax junk food for many reasons. Sacks, G. and Swinburn, B.
International Journal of Obesity, 35 7 July, pp. There are many ideas to how to help the obesity problem, one being a tax on junk food; however, should the men and women buying the junk food be taxed or the producers of the junk food? Written in bold the slogan immediately catches the eye and as it cleverly rhymes is very memorable. There has been a growing concern towards the issue of obesity and efforts were made by governmental and non-governmental organizations to tackle this health problem. A recent tax proposal on sugary beverages has caused uproar among the beverage industry because this tax, unlike the previous labeling regulations, is targeted directly towards the beverage industry. Presently, U. It would be a serious mistake to impose a tax on sugar-sweetened beverage because sugar-sweetened beverage is not the main cause of obesity, the tax wrongly attributes a large portion of responsibility of obesity to the consumers, and the tax cannot ensure a decline in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.
While convenient and cheap, the widespread eating of fast food has caused many health problems throughout America. By raising taxes and making fast food more expensive, I think Americans will begin to eat healthier, other restaurants will see economic success, and the government will spend much less on health care. He talks about the behind the scenes of the way junk food is manufactured, the science behind addictions to certain foods, and the rising numbers of obesity in both children and adults. It is important for Americans to have knowledge about the actions that companies are willing to take to protect their consumers. Obesity is growing at a faster rate than it has before. About two-thirds of the adults in America are considered obese, and statistics show that one in twenty people have extreme obesity.
How many more people must be a victim to obesity before we take action? Pearlberg argues to place junk-food taxes, and regulate food commercials to fight obesity. According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, approximately one-third of Americans are obese. There are several culprits to this alarming increase such as lack of exercise, failure to research nutrition information, and modality of convenience. Schlosser correlates the increase of consumption to increase of Americans becoming obese. As mentioned earlier, fast food availability is only one aspect of the poor health epidemic. There are not enough valid grounds to prove the increase of obesity and diseases such as diabetes.
The employees of the tobacco industry are not slipping cigarettes into the pockets of civilians forcibly. Similarly, these fast food corporations despite their sophisticated marketing are not completely directing individuals to consume their foods. Individuals have the freedom of choice and should be aware that their choices may lead to…. One of the biggest issues Americans are faced with today are the increasing obesity rates that spread throughout the nation. The American industry makes it easy to eat unhealthy.
Fast food is a quick, cheap, and tasteful meal made accessible to virtually anyone. When comparing prices at a grocery store, for the most part its clear junk foods are less expensive than healthy foods. If a tax was placed on unhealthy foods, it would make a substantial difference in the way consumers shopped. More and more young people are experiencing hypertension and childhood obesity, and because of which are seemingly becoming more prone to various diseases Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks? Many take a stand on the issue, as New York for example no longer allows the use of trans fats in their restaurants.
Still the cost of unhealthy food has remained nearly the same, while the cost of a high yield diet has soared beyond that of the rate of inflation Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks? Others object, saying that the tax is a form of discrimination, separating us about our assumed character and wellbeing Does This Tax Make Me Look Fat? Though the answer seems so clear to some at first how to go about imposing such taxes, it is important that the complexity of the situation is recognized to see if the tax would be effective enough to be worthwhile.
The government needs to make regulations for the health safety of obese Americans by limiting super-sized sugary drinks in eateries. Fast food industries biggest customers are children, they advertise unhealthy food by cartoons commercials on T. and they put toys inside their kid meals to get kids to pester their parents to buy it for them along with the buy of an unhealthy meal. default Some people will so become aware that the default choice is not as desirable, instead one might buy foods with trans fats, that are more desirable. Trans fat in foods are extremely important in a business to create a specific taste and texture in many foods that consumers find desirable, and without a desirable texture and taste to appeal to customers, businesses will lose customers and money.
Government regulations are going to save more lives than they kill by increasing the health of today's…. For years health experts have been warning Americans to lose weight and adopt a healthier lifestyle. Over time obesity rates have tripled. It is obvious we are losing the battle against obesity. Combating obesity and its numerous illnesses will not require more drugs to lower cholesterol, diet books, or workout videos. It will require rethinking our environment. Other measures need to be taken to tackle this national epidemic. Addressing this issue is no easy task. Several experts have suggested implementing a junk food tax. This would provide funding to regulate junk food, its advertising, and many other areas improving our health.
This idea has sparked a wide controversy in regard to the obesity issue, the benefits of such a tax plan, and our cherished individual freedom that health is our own responsibility. From to the average weight of Americans increased by 8. Higher taxes are imposed on healthy foods but not junk foods, making unhealthy foods easier and more convenient to obtain. To encourage healthy eating, higher taxes should be imposed on soft drinks and junk food. This strategy will surely influence a better diet and put America back at number one. HOME ESSAYS Fat Tax.
Top-Rated Free Essay. Fat Tax Satisfactory Essays. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Fat tax Food is everywhere. When people go to the market, they get what they enjoy. Sadly, what tastes yummy is normally not what is actually healthy for you. As bad as junk foods are, consumption is not decreasing and people are not getting the message. In a country that claims to value health, how can we display so many unhealthy, yet convenient, options? It is no secret that junk foods are unhealthy. In order for obesity to even begin to decrease, limitations must be put in place in the form of a junk food tax. The purpose of this tax is to decrease consumption of unhealthy foods, generate billions of dollars annually which be designated for relevant causes, such as; improving diet, obesity prevention, and nutrition education.
Many nutritionist say that if the price of junk food rose, the consumption would fall. If you enforce a higher price on junk food it will cause some people to think twice about buying it therefore making them think about the types of foods they choose. Junk food causes society to be lazy with their choice of food. This is because it is usually cheap, fast and convenient and undeniably tasty. A tax on unhealthy foods would encourage people to choose healthier foods which leads to improved health and would help reduce related diseases.
A fat tax would also encourage producers to supply foods lower in fat and sugar. One U. people won't buy them. You May Also Find These Documents Helpful. Better Essays. Junk Food Persuasive Essay Words 5 Pages. Junk Food Persuasive Essay. Read More. Satisfactory Essays. Why Junk Food Should Be Taxed Words 3 Pages.
The Fat Tax Concept Argumentative Essay,Recent Posts
WebIt is a dilemma that must be analyzed because there is such a mass increase in the world’s obesity rates. The main question that is being asked is should we fat tax junk food to WebObesity is an epidemic that is sweeping the United States at a rapid speed, and it kills. Obesity is responsible for killing more people than anything else, except for smoking. It WebOct 8, · Although obesity results from several other factors such as the lack of exercise and even genetic aspects, this paper argues that the introduction of fat taxes not only WebOn an individual level, an obese person will cost 42% more in health care than a person of healthy weight. A tax directly related to products known to cause obesity would offset the WebFat Tax. This report proposes that these costs and problems need to be addressed, and one avenue through which they can be is a junk food tax. This report proposes that there be WebAug 10, · A fat tax would also encourage producers to supply foods lower in fat and sugar. It's a simple idea, if things are expensive enough, the cost becomes prohibitive ... read more
On the other hand, the U. What had once required for you to get up and walk to the other side of the room can now be done by writing an email or picking up a phone. This argumentative essay on The Fat Tax Concept was written and submitted by your fellow student. The lack of physical inactivity and extreme poor dieting are catching up to almost the same threat as cigarettes and tobacco smoking. Powered by CiteTotal, best referencing machine. In addition, the tax will minimize the probability of companies of reducing production of taxed food commodities while increasing of those that are untaxed.
a rise in the incidence of diabetes signifies a health crisis as well as financial crisis. Obesity In Texas. New England Medical Center, Michael Dansinger of the Tufts says:. The correlation between socio-economic status and income is shown by the fact fat tax essay Mississippi, the poorest state in America, has the highest obesity rate in the nation Berl, Rachel. These costs are due to NHS costs of treating disease related to obesity, such as heart disease, angina, diabetes, strokes. This conviction poses a question of how the government should intervene to resolve this crisis, fat tax essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment